As 'Mary Poppins Returns' hits the cinema, we ask what the original film can teach us about investing
Dick Van Dyke may not have won an Oscar for his portrayal of Mr Dawes Senior in the original Mary Poppins film, but he did teach a generation of children about the merits of taking a long-term perspective to investments, the importance of diversification and the magic of compound returns.
On the Multi-Asset team at LGIM, we rarely (but not never) break into a song and dance routine. But Van Dyke's central tenets are pretty closely replicated in our investment beliefs. As 'Mary Poppins Returns' hits the cinema, we should celebrate the financial wisdom of the original.
The film is set in 1911, long before regulation of financial advice came into force. Without even a cursory 'know your customer' investigation, the custodians of the Fidelity Fiduciary Bank start reeling off a list of potential investments to the young Michael Banks.
Railways, dams and canals are all suggested as suitable investments for a seven-year old. Before he has had a chance to carefully consider the risk-return trade-off inherent in such infrastructure assets, his head is set spinning with talk of “bonds, chattels, dividends, shares”.
Amid the chorus line of umbrella-wielding bankers, three important points emerge:
At no point is young Michael told that 'the value of his investments may go down as well as up' or that 'the past is no guide to future performance'. But, if we put the potential miss-selling scandal in late Edwardian London to one side, there are some important financial lessons for all of us.
As broad principles to follow, rather than specific investment advice, they strike me as being “practically perfect in every way”.
Across the world, more women participate in the formal labour market than ever before. But as the quality of women's employment varies widely, what can be done to reduce international differences?